Close Close
ThinkAdvisor
Upside-down piggy bank with dollars bills falling out

Retirement Planning > Saving for Retirement

Lower Standard of Living in Retirement Looms for Many Americans: Pew

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The lack of retirement savings among American workers is a major problem for individuals and the government alike.
  • A new analysis shows that the nation’s retirement crisis could cost $1.3 trillion through 2040.
  • State-based retirement savings programs and mandates for private-sector savings can help ease the burden, experts say.

A lack of retirement savings among the U.S. workforce could cost the federal government nearly $1 trillion before 2040 while simultaneously putting significant strain on the budget of every state.

In fact, state spending on programs that support older Americans in financial need could total another $334 billion over the same time period, putting the cumulative government cost of the nation’s looming retirement crisis around $1.3 trillion.

These sobering statistics are among the headline findings of a new analysis published by The Pew Charitable Trusts. According to the analysis, this massive amount of social spending does not fill the retirement income gap facing the American workforce, and short of a major course correction, many households will be forced to reduce their standard of living in retirement.

Pew’s researchers say there is some good news, too, coming in the form of more state-run retirement savings programs and the expansion of state-based mandates for the creation of private-sector workplace retirement savings plans, particularly among small businesses.

Crucially, many of these programs include automatic enrollment provisions that allow workers to start accumulating modest retirement-oriented savings without having to make investment or contribution decisions. The idea is to put “retirement planning inertia” to work for Americans rather than against them.

John Scott, director of Pew’s retirement savings project, and Andrew Blevins, an officer working on the research project, say the creation and maintenance of auto-enrollment savings at both the state and the employer level could go a long way to shore up the aforementioned income gap.

According to the duo, even a small amount of regular contributions to retirement savings, if allowed to compound over the course of a typical working career, can close much of a given individual’s projected income shortfall, thereby reducing the burden on government safety net programs.

A Big Problem

At the heart of Pew’s new report is an analysis conducted by Econsult Solutions, an economic consulting firm.

According to the analysis, the share of households with people at least age 65 with less than $75,000 in annual income will increase by 43% by 2040, growing from 22.8 million in 2020 to 32.6 million in 2040.

Making matters worse, the growth in the older population will not be matched by comparable growth in working-age households. The analysis suggests the age dependency ratio — the ratio of households with people at least age 65 to those of working age — is expected to grow by 46% over that time period.

Specifically, in 2020, there were 37 households ages 65 and older for every 100 working-age households. That ratio is set to jump to 54 older households for every 100 working-age households by 2040.

As a result, the additional spending needed on programs such as Social Security and Medicaid will be borne by a smaller portion of the working-age population.

“And as these workers age, inadequate retirement savings will likely force reductions in retirement income, and therefore the quality of life, for many,” the analysis warns. “The average income shortfall in retirement among vulnerable older households in 2020 was $6,740, which will increase state spending for Medicaid and other assistance programs.”

The study estimates the cumulative additional taxpayer liability because of insufficient retirement savings could be as high as $13,600 per household.

Different States Face Different Burdens

The analysis shows this imbalance is a national issue with considerable consequences anticipated for the federal government, but there is considerable variability in terms of the strain that will be put on state budgets.

Pew’s online summary report includes an interactive tool that allows users to filter through states and compare their projected income gaps.

According to the tool, states with the biggest projected income gaps include both traditionally “red” and traditionally “blue” states, and they are distributed around the country. For example, California faces a considerable gap between now and 2040 ($63 billion), as do Texas ($20.8 billion), Florida ($17 billion) and New York ($26.9 billion).

One clear trend is that states with larger populations appear to face much bigger burdens, while those states in the center of the country that traditionally have offered fewer safety-net programs and had smaller populations face considerably smaller projected budgetary strain — though this doesn’t necessarily mean the citizens of such states will fare better in retirement.

Simply put, these states may not face a direct fiscal crisis tied to the funding of income insurance and health care support programs for their aging citizens, but that could merely mean these older Americans lack sorely needed aid during retirement.

A Better Path Forward

The Pew experts say automated savings programs can provide a way to steadily boost worker savings and help avoid some of the worst projected state and federal cost increases.

The researchers emphasize that, while more savings plans with automatic enrollment provisions are central to a better retirement future, this would not represent a retirement savings mandate. Instead, workers can opt out if and when they need to.

As Scott and Blevins point out, in the four states that have implemented such programs and started regular paycheck withdrawals, average savings rates are about $140 a month per worker.

This may seem like a modest amount, they explain, but many of those who are contributing are younger workers who have a significant time horizon during which their savings can be invested and grow substantially.

Overall, nearly a dozen states have already launched automated savings programs to help more private-sector workers routinely put money away for retirement. This year, lawmakers in more states are introducing measures to expand those opportunities, and the Pew experts encourage the timely adoption of such policies.

(Image: Adobe Stock)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.