Struggling to figure out what all the financial stress means to markets? So are professional forecasters.
As fast and furious as the news has come, the reaction among stock strategists and earnings analysts has been uniform: no reaction.
Whether unwilling to commit to a new course, unable to formulate a new thesis — or simply unconvinced anything important has happened — estimates remain almost exactly where they were before all the action erupted.
The stasis is most apparent among Wall Street strategists who predict markets based on macroeconomic trends. For a third straight month, their average year-end target for the S&P 500 stayed at 4,050, a streak of inaction not seen since 2005.
While frameable as conviction, the stillness more likely reflects confusion as to where the economy and market are heading.
Arguing for the latter is the gap between the highest and lowest year-end targets for the S&P 500: at 47%, it’s the widest at this time of year in two decades, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
“It’s a slow-motion series of events with unknowable outcomes,” said Michael Purves, founder of Tallbacken Capital Advisors. “We do not know how contagious this regional bank crisis is. We do not know the government response to an acceleration. And if we get a seize-up in lending, it is unclear to what magnitude that hits earnings.”
The lack of reaction contrasts with big money managers who quickly adjusted positions after the banking turmoil.
Equity-focused long/short hedge funds have dumped financial shares and sought safety in technology megacaps, while trend-following funds unwound some positions after being caught out by cross-asset volatility, according to data compiled by Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s trading desk.