Close Close
ThinkAdvisor
The U.S. Capitol Building

Regulation and Compliance > Legislation

Hotly Anticipated Secure 2.0 Act Corrections Bill Lands in House and Senate

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • It's normal for significant legislation to have technical drafting errors, but the Secure 2.0 Act package included some big ones.
  • One big error, for instance, would inadvertently disallow 401(k) catch-up contributions after 2024.
  • The push is already on to find a piece of must-pass legislation to which to attach the new Secure 2.0 corrections bill.

Two key Congressional committees have released identical discussion drafts of legislation containing Secure 2.0 Act technical corrections and other clarifications.

Late on Wednesday, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee published a discussion draft of key legislation containing technical corrections and other clarifications concerning the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (Secure) 2.0 Act, colloquially known as the Secure 2.0 Act.

Members of the House Committee on Ways and Means also introduced an identical measure Wednesday, and the text of the bicameral discussion draft is now available for public review and comment.

Stakeholders across the financial services and retirement planning industries have been eagerly awaiting introduction of the legislation.

As various experts have stressed in discussions with ThinkAdvisor over the last year and a half, it is normal for big pieces of legislation to contain technical drafting errors, but the Secure 2.0 Act package included some big ones that could be materially disruptive for retirement savers and employers — clearly cutting against Congress’s stated intent.

One big error is found in Section 603 of the law, which is intended to increase pretax “catch-up contributions” for 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts by 50% for individuals between the ages of 60 and 63.

However, as written, the law would inadvertently disallow catch-up contributions and significantly restrict how the catch-up contribution rules apply to employees who participate in plans of unrelated employers.

Congress’s actual intent in the errant section was to require catch-up contributions for participants whose wages from the employer sponsoring the plan exceeded $145,000 for the preceding year to be made on a Roth basis while permitting other participants to make catch-up contributions on either a pre-tax or a Roth basis, some expert say.

These are among the clarifications included in the new bill.

Fixing RMDs, SIMPLE IRAs, Starter 401(k)s

Other Secure 2.0 sections addressed in the discussion draft include Section 107, which is designed to allow Americans to further delay required minimum distributions, and Section 601, which is designed to allow SIMPLE IRA and Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) plans to add Roth features.

An issue identified in Section 121 is also addressed, with the discussion draft seeking to fix an inadvertent error that reduced the contribution limit for the new Starter 401(k)s.

Under the draft correction legislation, the contribution limits of the Starter 401(k)/403(b) plans will be the same as the contribution limit for individual retirement accounts IRAs and will be indexed for inflation starting in 2024.

Other corrections are made to Section 110, meant to reaffirm the potential to treat student loan payments as elective deferrals for the purpose of matching contributions in retirement plans, and to Section 125, which improves plan coverage for part-time workers.

What Comes Next

One industry lobbyist who is familiar with the ongoing legislative negotiations told ThinkAdvisor that the push is already on to find a piece of must-pass legislation to which to attach the new Secure 2.0 corrections bill.

Though many in the retirement industry would prefer to see the legislation make it into law this year — thereby allowing the IRS and other regulators enough time to promulgate guiding regulations ahead of important implementation deadlines coded into the Secure 2.0 law — that would be a big lift.

There is simply a very limited number of legislative days remaining in 2023, and there is a bigger need to head off a potential government shutdown that could strike as soon as mid-January if a spending agreement isn’t reached by Democrats and Republicans.

One of the most potentially expeditious pathways for passage would be for the corrections bill to be folded into either of the two big spending packages that will need to be passed sequentially in January and February to keep the federal government open, but it is difficult to say whether that may happen, given the polarized nature of the debate.

Credit: Shutterstock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.